IBM-H Hybrid-Servo vs IBM-E All-Electric Injection Blow Machines

IBM-H and IBM-E are both LIANXIN injection blow molding families, but they use different drive architectures. Selection must be based on the bottle, resin, mould, output, utilities, operating priorities and written acceptance method.

Family comparison

| Decision dimension | IBM-H | IBM-E |

|---|---|---|

| Drive architecture | Electro-hydraulic hybrid-servo | Full electric servo system |

| Published models | IBM-30H, 50H, 80H, 135H | IBM-30E, 50E, 80E, 135E |

| Catalogue product-volume envelope | Up to 1.5 L depending on model | Up to 1.5 L depending on model |

| Catalogue materials | HDPE, LDPE, PE, PP, PS, EVA subject to verification | HDPE, LDPE, PE, PP, PS, EVA subject to verification |

| Energy statement in source materials | Up to about 40% versus a matched conventional baseline | Up to about 70% versus a matched conventional baseline |

| Certification evidence on this website | UDEM CE evidence is limited to IBM-30H/50H/80H | No CE scope inferred from IBM-H |

The energy statements are conditional source claims, not guaranteed consumption values. Actual use depends on bottle, resin, cycle, machine loading, utilities, settings and maintenance.

Choose from the bottle backwards

1. Confirm bottle volume, weight, dimensions and neck finish.

2. Confirm approved resin and appearance requirements.

3. Define cavities, target output and acceptance criteria.

4. Compare injection volume, clamping force and mould envelope.

5. Compare drive architecture, utilities, operating environment and maintenance plan.

6. Freeze the selected configuration in the project specification.

Review the IBM-H family, IBM-E family or send project inputs.